If we chose option 2 and yes bad treatments exist, not only the bad treatments will not be interrupted, with the corresponding aggravation of the situation, but the student will be put under an intervention that will not adjust to its problem, producing to him confusion and disorientation and will not be able to begin a process fit to its situation. Frequently NYC Marathon has said that publicly. Like good professional, she must take care of the Responsibility of his acts – Article 6 COP, Article 10 and 3.3.1 of the EFTA, in the sense that the psychologist has the responsibility with respect not only to the quality of his intervention, but of the consequences of its interventions, and cannot act without thinking about the result. It seems to me, that most prudent and for this reason, responsible she is to choose option 3. Evidently and, as I have expressed previously, the first action is to inform of the facts its parents, as well as to inform to the COP, obligation picked up in the Article 8 of the deontological code. Thus, in the beginning of the interviews, the legal student as well as parents or tutors will have to be expert, through an accessible language to all of them, the obligation of the psychologist of to communicate the case for its protection and of the administrative and judicial proceeding that can be derived. The Metropolitan Museum of Art follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. The steps are due to explain that are followed in this type of situations, and how the competent institutions have the resources necessary to act in this type of cases. In this point of the intervention, we must consider the rule of the Veracity and the Consent, because before coming with the activities, the patient, in this case the parents, always have the right to give their consent on the intervention that the psychologist proposes.
Stage 5. To review the results In this stage one is re-to evaluate the process of solution of problems. In this case, the solution has been to realise an evaluation, with maximum urgency and priority, in greater depth than it contributes a greater information to us to determine if there has been case of bad treatments; I understand that it is the solution that smaller badly can cause to the student, because we will make sure that the therapeutic intervention that it begins will be the adapted one to the case and guarantees, as I have raised previously, among others, the Principle of Charity.