Everything this if must to the case of the statute of the cities that was regulated after eleven years and integrates articles 182 and 183 of the Constitution of 1988 person in charge for defining what it means to fulfill the social function of the city and the urban property. This law delegates to be able for the cities, offering for the cities an innovative set, beyond a new conception of planning and urban management. In the statute of the cities one gains a new instrument for the use and urban improvement, the managing plan that is the basic instrument of the politics of urban development and urban expansion, for (Souza; Rodrigues (. 2004) ' ' Managing plan are documents of destined planejamentos to guide and to mark out with buoys the expansion of city and the use of solo' '. The managing plan is an instrument specifies well of which the main points are: he is obligator for cities with more than twenty a thousand inhabitants, integrant of regions metropolitans and urban, integrant agglomerations of tourist areas of space interest and etc. the 3 – managing plans of Great Campina (1996? 2006): Soon comparison and one analyze of the managing plan of 2006. The managing plans of Great Campina of 1996? 2006 have a difference in its presentation; the plan of 1996 backwards as macro-zoning of the campinense territory no longer chapter 1 in how much in the 2006 plan an introduction has all on what this plan means and which the objective of it. The two plans keep a sequence of segments of the interest zones that the city hall characterized as being of importance for the improvement of the city, zones these that if detach the zones of urban qualification and zone of urban recovery. A point sufficiently argued is the participativa budgetary management, or either, the participation of the population in the elaboration of the plan and the management of paid the deriving resources of tax.