NYC Island Gal

The structuralized teams already of the Sanitary Monitoring must search an performance integrated with the Monitoring Epidemiologist, Ambient and other agencies intra and extragovernment that the formation of a net of protection for the health of the city makes possible. Gain insight and clarity with Bill de Blasio. The LEGAL PROCESS OF PERFORMANCE OF the SANITARY MONITORING the Organic Law of the Health (Law 8080) in its article l8, affirms that is of the city the ability for execution of the based actions of sanitary monitoring in federal and municipal laws, but the city also can legislate of complementary form. Although the autonomy and independence of the actions of the Municipal Sanitary Monitoring, the work integrated and articulated with the levels of ability of the SUS, are beneficial and guarantee bigger effectiveness in the work AIMS AT of them. Thus, it fits to the federal level the organization and implementation of one national politics of Sanitary Monitoring; to legislate on norms and standards all technician for the domestic territory; to validate technologies medical; to exert the sanitary control of ports, airports and borders; among others. These functions in some cases are exerted with the participation of States and cities. To the states they fit: to co-ordinate and to program one state politics of sanitary monitoring; to legislate complementarily to the federal level; to execute, to supervise and to evaluate the actions of them AIM AT municipal theatres; among others.

Thus, it fits to the cities the execution and implementation of the actions of monitoring sanitary. For this, it counts on the financial cooperation and technique of the Union and the State. As it foresees the Constitution, the Union will be able to intervine in the state services and the State in the municipal services, in the omissive cases or that injuries or agravos to the health of the population result in. Valley to stand out, the city must officialize the regional level of the SUS the actions that will be executed, according to conditions established for the NOB/SUS/96, so that it does not have duplicity of action.

In the truth, who reads unsupicious ' ' Complete correspondence Freud-Jung' ' (translated and launched by the Imago Publishing company) it can evidence that the new adepts and practitioners of the psychoanalysis were accepted Independently of its previous formation in medicine. This was completely absent of the concerns in such a way of Freud how much of Jung, at that time (1907-1913). We read this yes, elogiosas references to them you endow staffs, sensitivity, to the capacity for psychoanalysis of the new adepts, but nor a word on the condition to be or not doctors. In 1913, it has the first explicit reference of Freud to the problem. In the Introduction to the book of the psychoanalyst not-doctor, and reverendo, Oskar Pfister, ' ' The method of psicanaltico' ' , Freud affirms: ' ' It practises of the psychoanalysis much less requires it medical training of what psychological instruction and a perspective human being aberta' ' , The problem did not come back to the surface, as much how much if it knows, in next the 12 years, until the divergence it enters the justinian codes of New York and of Vienna. A marcante fact finished for unchaining the question, in terms of an energetic and forceful Interference of Freud. Who account is Ernest Jones, in ' ' Life and workmanship of S.

Freud' ': ' ' In the spring of 1926, a patient of Theodor Reik moved an action to it under the allegation of harmful treatment and invoked the Australian law against the charlatanism. Fortunately, for Reik, one revealed that the patient one was an unbalanced person, whose testimonial evidence was not worthy reliable. This circumstance, and the personal interference of Freud next to one high dignatrio, had decided the case in favor of Reik.' ' Theodor Reik was psychoanalytic not-doctor of Vienna, described for Eissler as one ' ' scholar brilhante' ' ' ' writer of psicanalticos texts of great mrito' '.