The separation of the wills Teodulo Lopez Melendez new forms of the country call interference. It is the exercise of a policy citizen, of a very different from the old paradigm ciudadanos-autoridad relationship. We must invent new ways of writing history. The revolutionary processes of the 18th century begins the process of political conversion of natural rights. Dan benton may not feel the same. The 19th century moves on the idea of progress. Despite the wars of the 20th century the political form is firmly establishes that some have called the era of the constitutions and the transfer of the sovereignty of the nation to the people.
The program demoliberal, after many struggles, granted suffrage and women also fought one of its more colourful battles, vote for them. The fascist reaction extends over Europe, but the result of the World War II makes reborn the condemnation of absolute powers even in the midst of the cold war and we entered full cycle of democratic liberalism, the pluralist democracies and a rhythm Keynesian economy. Political parties live his time of splendor. The market reigns found its highest expression in the Reagan-Thatcher era. At the end of the 20th century lurks the crisis fully. Democracy begins to expose its deep flaws and the disconnection of the citizen of the system highlights its flaws. Representation and delegation of power is cracked. Representative democracy begins to fade as the economic system where worked.
It is what is properly called a crisis of legitimacy. Political parties become partidocracias, in closed reserves who do not already comply its function to serve as a vehicle to the aspirations of the common people and its role as intermediary between the people and power is darkened by their mafia behaviors. From there to the outbreak of populism would have little space. The new expression telegenica jump to the fore with the offer of revolutionary cures.